Nobel Prize Winning Physicist Shows Why Climate Alarm Is False Science

I’ve done extensive research on climate change and climate alarmism. Climate change is perfectly normal, while climate alarm borders on a cult-like mental illness.

Experts know that the climate in the Northern Hemisphere was unusually warm in the period 1000 AD to 1300 AD. It was at that time that the Vikings came up with the name “Greenland” (translation from the Nordic) to describe a place that today is covered in ice sheets.

At the time, Vikings had farms and even vineyards there. Westward exploration continued into the present-day St. Lawrence River.

There’s some evidence that Vikings may have encountered members of the Iroquois Nations (there’s a movie plot!) before retreating eastward. That was followed by an extended cooling period from about 1300 AD to 1850 AD.

At its most extreme, residents of London complained of a “year with no summer” and ice fairs were held on the frozen Thames River. No bridges were needed; you could cross the Thames on foot for long periods because the river was frozen and the ice was thick.

Scientists also have good working theories on what causes these changes: Solar cycles, volcanoes, ocean currents including subduction, ocean warming and cooling events such as El Niño, La Niña, and more. The best research shows that the biggest contributor to global warming when it happens is water vapor such as the kind spewed into the atmosphere by the recent eruption of underwater volcano Hunga Tonga-Hunga H’apai near Tonga in the South Pacific.

Notice how none of this has anything to do with CO₂, coal, electricity generation, industrial output or the usual villains of the elite climate alarmists who are out to destroy society.

With real science ready to refute climate alarmism, one would think a Nobel Prize winning physicist would be free to speak at a climate conference sponsored by the International Monetary Fund. Guess again.

As described in this article, Dr. John Clauser, the Nobelist in question, was invited to speak by the IMF on the validity of UN climate models. He was then rudely disinvited when his skeptical (but valid) views were discovered.

This is a good example of the devotion of climate alarmists to false science. It also shows how insecure they are in their own beliefs that they can’t tolerate a dissenting view. Let’s hope that real scientists like John Clauser keep up their good work and the climate fraud edifice finally falls of its own weight.

Corporate leaders and institutional fiduciaries looking to incorporate state of the art predictive analytics to their risk mitigation and strategic analysis should click the link to learn more about Raven Predictive Analytics®.