Kamala Is A Complete Fake. Her Face Gives It Away

Body language is a powerful signal that very few can control. Research shows that when guests appear on television, the viewers hear almost nothing of what is being said. Instead, they focus on the face and demeanor of the speaker.

Is the speaker being honest? Can I trust this person? Is this person self-confident and likely to remain calm in a crisis?

On the other hand, the viewer may ask, Is this person insecure? Will this person look out for herself instead of being concerned about the country? This is what viewers are doing even if subconsciously rather than taking a speaker’s words at face value.

Other tells include a person who cannot look you in the eye (or the TV equivalent, which is looking straight at the camera). Viewers are put off by shifty eyes (although this can sometimes be unintentional when unseasoned TV guest shifts his eyes between the camera and a studio monitor. The monitor is a natural attraction. That’s why I always ask for the monitor to be turned off so I can focus on the camera).

Wiggling in your seat, tapping your toes, touching your face or mashing your hands together are other examples of bad TV demeanor that leaves an impression of weakness or insecurity in the minds of the viewers. Body language matters. That’s why this column by Miranda Devine is so powerful.

She takes a look at Kamala Harris’s body language in the September debate with Donald Trump. Obviously, Kamala’s handlers know as much about body language on TV as I do. But they had few options since Kamala is not that bright and has no real convictions when it comes to policies except to do what the extreme left wants her to do.

The solution for the Harris camp during the debate with Trump was to turn her into an actress with pre-arranged poses such as rolling her eyes, putting her fist to her chin like Rodin’s “Thinker,” and silently laughing when Trump was making a serious point. Far from convincing the audience, Kamala’s display of rehearsed poses revealed to the audience what a phony she is.

Of course, the phony body language was in sync with her lies about Trump, none of which were challenged by the ABC network fact-checkers (who usually got the facts wrong themselves). The overall impression the viewers got of Kamala was of a weak and insecure individual despite the canned rhetoric.

The immediate judgment of corporate media was that Kamala Harris “won” the debate. But the lasting subliminal impression is that of a weak and insecure loser. That’s the real power of body language. The camera doesn’t lie.

Corporate leaders and institutional fiduciaries looking to incorporate state of the art predictive analytics to their risk mitigation and strategic analysis should click the link to learn more about Raven Predictive Analytics®.