BLOG

COP28 Is Ending in Chaos and Discord. That’s A Good Thing.
For those unfamiliar with United Nations jargon, “COP” stands for Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. COP28 is the 28th general convention of the parties. It recently concluded a major global conference in Dubai with over 70,000 attendees including heads of state, climate czars, UN officials, NGOs, media, and lobbyists.
Officially, COP28 and the older Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Climate Accord are the building blocks of the new world order based on climate hysteria and lies about the role of CO2 emissions. Unofficially, COP28 is part of a global racket intended to shakedown rich countries to transfer wealth to poor countries.
Ostensibly this multi-hundred-trillion-dollar wealth transfer is to help poor countries deal with the impact of climate change caused by rich country emissions. That’s nonsense. There is no scientific proof that human emissions cause climate change. The “proof” that you hear about consists of rigged data force-fed into flawed models that can’t even back-test correctly let alone forecast.
The best evidence is that climate change is caused by solar cycles, volcanoes, ocean currents, and above all, water vapor in the form of clouds. COP28 was nothing more than a gun-to-the-head stick-up by 70,000 grifters with their hands out trying to get a piece of the action as wealth is transferred from north to south for no good reason.
The post-COP28 news coverage has been all about a “historic” meeting that agreed for the first time to end the use of so-called fossil fuels in a reasonable period of time. That’s more nonsense because the loopholes in the final communique were wide enough to drive a truck through.
The last-minute verbal wrangling is summarized here. In fact, the oil-producing nations, including the host country UAE, were able to include language that said any transition to the green new scam would have to be “orderly.” That’s thinly veiled code for slow and non-radical.
Hopefully, the energy-producing nations bought time for the climate scam to be exposed as a fraud before even more damage is done to the economy. Here’s how Bloomberg reported the outcome:
“In the end, the so-called UAE Consensus calls for countries to quickly transition energy systems away from hydrocarbons in a “just” and “orderly” fashion. These caveats made the deal palatable to oil- and gas-producing nations worried about the impact of the shift on their tax receipts. And yet, the deal still leaves the door open for countries to choose how to achieve global temperature goals, rather than being told how to get there. The text delivers a mixed message on the role of natural gas, allowing countries to continue burning it as a bridging fuel. Not everyone is happy with the consensus. Anne Rasmussen, the lead negotiator for Samoa, who represented small island nations most vulnerable to the cyclones, hurricanes and rising sea levels caused by climate change, said it amounted to “an incremental advancement over business as usual.” Ultimately, as Al Jaber repeatedly reminded the conference, the future will be decided by individual governments, consumers and boardrooms.”
We can all feel relieved that Samoa is not in charge of the world (yet). Common sense prevailed at COP28, but it was a close-run thing. Let’s hope that common sense still has the last word until the entire climate scam agenda is tossed in the trash.
Corporate leaders and institutional fiduciaries looking to incorporate state of the art predictive analytics to their risk mitigation and strategic analysis should click the link to learn more about Raven Predictive Analytics®.
OUR MISSION
Raven Predictive Analytics®, a patent-pending enterprise software as a service (SaaS), disrupts existing predictive analytics by more accurately modeling capital markets using complex systems, augmented intelligence, and team science.
Presented in a streamlined and personalized data center, Raven Predictive Analytics®; will revolutionize the way corporate risk managers and institutional investors read the market.